Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Supercoder give you ways to boost your Hemoccult Test Coding.



If you want to keep the money coming for in-office examination of fecal occult blood test (FOBT), you should train eyes on the difference between three hemoccult codes and their purpose.

Here's a scenario:

A 60-year old patient presented in the office complaining of diarrhea preceded by intestinal cramping, which lasted two weeks. The patient has no history of cancer in the family. He also did not feel nauseous at all. The physician took a stool sample to test for both parasites and blood. How should you approach this situation?

Assign the right code for each type of collection

Since the year 2007, CPT has assigned two codes that you can use for post digital rectal exam (DREs) and consecutive specimen collection:





  • 82270
  • 82272

    Update: With effect from January 1, 2007, CPT has terminated HCPCS code G0107 and replaced by 82270 even for routine Medicare screening FOBT.

    Remember: In the above scenario, it is not clear whether the doctor examined the samples herself or sent them to the lab. But as a general rule, parasite exams almost always take place in the lab. Here, the lab would be paid for the test directly.

    Do not forget: There are interval limitations for screenings established by Medicare and most commercial carriers.

    On the other hand, if a patient presents to the office with symptoms, the gastroenterologist would carry out a diagnostic FOBT, and you should bill it with 82272. One can bill CPT 82272 if 1 to 3 specimens are obtained. The diagnosis code for the test would be related to the patient's presenting symptoms.

    Count number of tests

    If you are still not sure whether you have got the right code by differentiating screening from diagnostic, you can look further into the test's details. Identify how many tests the gastroenterologist or lab performs. For a three-specimen collection, you would go for 82270. Use a single-specimen collection with 82272.

    Red flag: Even though 82270 involves analysis of three specimens, you should always assign 82270 with a “1" in the units field. Some coders incorrectly interpret 82270's descriptor of “one to three simultaneous determinations" to mean they should bill “each of the three determinations with one unit of CPT 82270 (82270 x 3)." The revised description more clearly reminds providers that the code identifies as many as three consecutive determinations.

    What if: The patient fails to collect all three samples. You may still bill 82270. If this happens, the laboratory should carry out analysis of the one or two collected specimen, report the results accordingly and record one unit of 82270.

    Determine who obtains the sample

    Where the sample is collected and who performs it can also include you in to the right FOBT code. CPT Code 82270 will always be billed as a separate service when the developer has been placed on the cards after the three completed cards (or one completed triple card) have been returned to the office. In a nutshell, the doctor should not collect the specimen in the office.

    Instead you should use 82272 when the doctor carries out a digital rectal exam in the office and obtains a sample at that time.


  • Sunday, November 28, 2010

    How to Code Cosmetic Ptosis Repair

    Having issue how to code Cosmetic Ptosis repair. For more on this and all 2011 CPT updates visit a medical coding guide like Supercoder.

    There is this Medicare patient of ours who'll be having a leva to resection on his right eye for ptosis. The ophthalmologist wants to do this as a bilateral procedure; however the patient's left eye is a non-seeing eye. As the operation on the right side may be medically necessary, but the left side would likely be considered cosmetic, how should I go about coding this surgery?

    Well, you should report each side of the bilateral procedure on a separate line, appending modifiers LT (left side) and RT (Right side), linking each side to the appropriate diagnosis code explaining the necessity for the surgery.

    In this situation, one side will be medically necessary, while the other will be cosmetic – the procedure will not benefit the vision on the non-seeing eye.

    Here's what you need to do: Before the surgery, have the patient sign an advance beneficiary notice of non-coverage (ABN) prior to surgery, stating that he's aware that Medicare will not cover the procedure carried out on the left eye. Ensure your ABN is in layman's terms and specifies the specific reasons for non-coverage. (you shouldn't use CPT Code, ICD 9 codes on the ABN form).

    Source URL :- http://www.supercoder.com/coding-newsletters/my-ophthalmology-coding-alert/reader-questions-report-cosmetic-ptosis-repair-separately-15819-article

    You must also specify the estimated cost of the service on the ABN. The original signed ABN indicating the patients decision ( be sure the patient has chosen one of the options) to accept financial responsibility, is maintained by the practice and a fully executed copy must be provided to the patient. Append modifier (Waiver of liability statement on file) to the procedure done on the non-seeing eye to indicate that the patient was informed before and has selected the option to be responsible for the non-covered service and unpaid amount.

    For instance: The patient has congenital ptosis (743.61), and his left eye is non-seeing. The ophthalmologist carries out levator resection (67904, Repair of blepharoptosis; [tarso] levator resection or advancement, external approach) bilaterally. Code as follows:






  • Line 1: 67904-RT linked to 743.61
  • Line 2: 67904-LT-GA linked to V50.1 (Elective surgery for purposes other than remedying health states; other plastic surgery for unacceptable cosmetic appearance).

    If your documentation shows that the procedure was medically necessary on the right side, Medicare will reimburse the full amount for 67904-RT. The cosmetic diagnosis linked to 67904-LT-GA will prompt the carrier to deny the specific service due to the diagnosis and non-coverage of cosmetic services, and the explanation of benefits (EOB) received by the patient will confirm that the patient is responsible for payment.


  • Wednesday, November 24, 2010

    Wrong Answer Could Weigh Heavily on your Medical Coding Practice

    In Medical Coding a mistake can also impact on your practice’s reimbursements.

    Your ophthalmologist provides a new patient with a standard office-visit E/M. You use an established patient E/M to report the encounter. And if you thought it’s no big deal, you are wrong.

    Not only is the coding wrong, this mistake will also have an impact on your practice’s reimbursements. To add to it, Medicare’s non-payment of consultation codes means that medical coders will have to answer the new versus established question more often than before.

    For Medicare and payers that follow their lead, medical coders will now have to choose the correct code, new or established, to bill for what used to be consults and didn’t have a new versus established component concept.

    Here’s an expert advice on new and established patients.

    If you ignore new patient E/Ms, you could be losing your deserved money

    For physician practices, the difference between new and established patient codes is the payment rate. Think about this comparison of average national payouts for new and established level-two E/m codes respectively:





  • 99202 pays about $68 per encounter (1.86 transitioned nonfacility relative value units [RVUs] multiplied by the temporary 2010 Medicare conversion rate of 36.8729)
  • 99212 pays about $40 per encounter (1.08 transitioned nonfacility RVUs multiplied by the temporary 2010 Medicare conversion rate of 36.8729).

    That is almost $30 lost if you report 99212 instead of 99202 mistakenly. The main difference between a new and established patient visit, service-wise, can be minimal: Often it includes simple tasks like setting up a new chart and quizzing the patient a little closer to get familiar with him.
    First ask 3-year question

    If your patient has had a face-to-face service with the ophthalmologist within the last three years, then the patient is considered established. So let us say a patient reports to your ophthalmologist and gets a level-three E/M service on April 20, 2010. The patient’s record points to the fact that she received a previous face-to-face E/M service from another ophthalmologist within the group on Dec. 14, 2008. Since this is an established patient, you should report 99213.

    For established patients, Face Time is a must

    As a coder, what would you do when the patient has received treatment from your ophthalmologist within the last three years, however the doctor didn’t actually lay eyes on the patient? This is a different coding situation; here’s what you need to do: ‘Interpret the phrase ‘new patient’ to mean a patient who hasn’t received any personal services – to put it separately, an E/M service or other face-to-face service from the physician or physician group practice within the last three years.

    This means that you might be able to report a patient as new if your ophthalmologist provided services for the patient less than three years ago, provided it wasn’t a face-to-face service.

    Check specialty when deciding status

    Coders who work in multispecialty practices will have to pay attention to one more new/established patient status rule.

    For more on this, and other evaluation & management coding guidelines, stay tuned to a medical coding guide like Supercoder
  • New Choice to Boost your Diagnosis Coding

    ICD-9 Codes 2011 going to effect in October, and here new ‘attention deficit’ to boost your Diagnosis Coding

    The 2011 ICD-9 codes going into effect on October 1 have a few welcome additions for younger patients. Here are some examples of new diagnoses you could find yourself reporting on a regular basis.

    Attention deficit options provide a better starting point ICD-9 2011 adds the 799.5x family to the ‘I’ll defined and unknown causes of morbidity and mortality’ section. The just-arrived codes include:







  • 799.51 -- Attention or concentration deficit
  • 799.52 -- Cognitive communication deficit
  • 799.53 -- Visuospatial deficit
  • 799.54 -- Psychomotor deficit
  • 799.55 -- Frontal lobe and executive function deficit
  • 799.59 -- Other signs and symptoms involving cognition.

    This new series will be useful for symptoms and signs as a diagnosis before the doctor establishes a definitive diagnosis. Physicians treat children with concerns regarding attention or activity. You do not have sufficinet information after the first visit for an official diagnosis; but then you still need something to report.

    V codes address retained fragments

    ICD-9 2011 also comes up with a series of specific V codes for diferent types of retained fragments. The series (V90.01- V90.9) address objects ranging from metal, plastic or wood to animal quills or spines, glass, teeth, and other specified foreign bodies, including radioactive fragments.

    Remember that you won’t report a code for foreign body removal in conjunction with V90.x. These foreign bodies are retained. You will deal with it in terms of the patient’s history and physical, however not an actual procedure to remove the object.

    Want to know more about these attention deficit choices and other 2011 ICD-9 code(http://www.supercoder.com/icd9-codes/) changes? Just stay tuned to a medical coding guide like Supercoder.
  • Monday, November 22, 2010

    Three ways to add an Additional $293 in Minor Procedure Pay

    You could be missing out on opportunities to capture higher-paying procedure codes if you are overlooking reporting these splinting and foreign body removal codes.

    Procedure 1: Gather $38 for sport injury splinting

    Pee-wee football has started up and with it the chance you will see an increased number of patients with jammed fingers. For a non-angulated finger, the pediatrician might fix the sprain, splint the finger and send the patient home.

    For the finger splint application, you could report 29130, which contains 1.02 RVUs, using the Resource Based Relative Value Scale. Even though global fracture care codes include the initial cast or application, you may use the casting and splinting codes in addition to an appropriate E/M code with modifier 25 when you don't report a fracture treatment code.

    Do not miss: For the history, exam, and medical decision making that led to the decision to splint the finger, you'd report a significant separate E/M service appended with modifier 25. As you are not reporting a global fracture care code, you may also code the x-ray.

    Procedure 2: Use tapping procedure code to add on $38

    If a toe is broken, the pediatrician might buddy tape it to the adjacent toe and refer the patient to an orthopedist. For the buddy tapping, you could code 29550 (Strapping toes). The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, which many payers adopt, assigns the code 1.04 RVUs. Report the history, examination and medical decision making preceding the decision to buddy tape the toe with 99201-99215 appended with modifier 25.

    For the x-ray, go for 73600.

    Procedure 3: Capture $227 on splinter removal

    Removing a splinter from a patient's foot can net you around $227. For example, a pediatrician removes a 3 mm wooden splinter from a child's foot. Rather than including the work in an E/M code, you can use 28190, which has 6.15 RVUs.

    Tip: Prior to using 28190, check that the documentation includes two details. The code need excising or opening to remove the foreign body. You have to say how and what you removed. Proper documentation could read: “1 mm incision made with X, removed splinter. This entry meets 28190's requirements of incision and removal.

    Source URL :- http://www.supercoder.com/coding-newsletters/my-pediatric-coding-alert/revenue-boosting-procedures-29130-29550-28190-3-ways-you-can-add-an-additional-293-in-minor-procedure-pay-article


    Sunday, November 21, 2010

    CPT 2011 Bids Goodbye to 90465-90474, Welcomes Hello Vaccine

    For combination vaccines that may involve counseling on as many as five different diseases, getting paid as though you counseled on one never seemed right, however CPT 2011 lets you capture that extra counseling work.

    Multiple component vaccines (Pentacel, Kinrix, MMRV) have had an economic disincentive related to the loss of immunization administration codes with these vaccines.

    As the present CPT vaccine administration codes (90465-90467) are coded per vaccine, the codes capture payment for only one counseling administration code.

    CPT 2011 will delete 90465-90468. The 90471-90474 (Immunization administration ...) codes will remain.

    Good news: In the coming year, you will report the immunization administration with counseling codes per component. Here's how:

    Step 1: Report 90460 as vaccine adminstration W/ counseling base code

    You shouldn't look at administration route when selecting which immunization adminstration with counseling code. For vaccine administration except for H1N1, you'll assign one code for each vaccine's initial component: 90460.

    Step 2: Use second vaccine component with +90461

    Pediatric coders can heave a sigh of relief as the complexities over deciding which 90465-90468 code to use as the base code will soon end. The CPT codes 2011 for the coming year give you only one vaccine administration with counseling base code (90460). You will report the same add on code for each additional vaccine component: +90461.

    If the physician, nonphysician practitioner (NP), physician assistant (PA), or other healthcare qualified professional provides vaccine counseling to a patient less than 19 years old for a second disease/component, you will assign +90461 for the second vaccine component. You will always report +90461 in addition to 90460.

    Step 3: Use units to report 3+ Administrations

    You will keep using the same add-on code, +90461, for each additional vaccine component. Bill the add-on code, in addition to the number of units that represents the number of components.

    For more information on CPT 2011 and the entire CPT code list, sign up for a medical coding guide like Supercoder.com


    Do Not Miss Out On Ancillary Procedures with Kyphoplasty, Vertebroplasty

    Report radiologic supervision and interpretation, however leave out bone biopsies.

    When your orthopedist carries out a vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty procedure, you will need to decide if there are additional services you could be coding and reporting. Get the low down on what you can and cannot report separately.

    Modifier 26 brings you radiology pay

    You can report the operating surgeon's imaging for needle positioning and injection assessment during a kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty procedure. You will use either 72291 or 72292 in addition to fluoroscopic guidance.

    CPT revised these codes for 2006 to use with either vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. You should be sure to append modifier 26 (PC) to the appropriate radiology service code to show that the surgeon provided only the physician component of the service and didn't supply the equipment, etc.

    Caution: If your surgeon doesn't personally carry out the guidance, you can't bill for it. Rather, the healthcare professional who provides the service (often the facility radiologist) will bill for it.

    Include bone biopsy with main procedure

    When you are reporting 22520-+22522 or 22523-+22525, you won't code separately for a bone biopsy. You shouldn't report 20225 if the biopsy occurs at any of the same spinal levels as the primary procedure.

    Here is the reason: The CPT code descriptors stimulate this limitation as do many payer local coverage determinations (LCDs). To add to it, CCI edits(http://www.supercoder.com/coding-tools/cci-edits-checker/) bundle bone biopsy to vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty codes. As there's boney tissue removed during the process anyway, it wouldn't be right to charge for taking some specifically for a biopsy.

    Alternative: If your surgeon carries out bone biopsy at a level not addressed by the vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty, but you may report the biopsy separated with modifier 59 (distinct procedural service) to indicate the unrelated nature and separate locations of the two procedures.