Procedure's Intent Decides Your 11100 Reimbursement

Know When You Should Use CPT 11100: Key to biopsy pay

In case you're puzzled about when you should report a biopsy and also when you should select an excision code, ask these simple questions to know when you are supposed to report CPT 11100 and avoid this common dermatology denial trap.

1. Why did the dermatologist do away with the skin abnormality?

When your dermatologist examines a patient who has a suspicious lesion, for instance a mole that transformed it's shape over time or has uneven borders, the dermatologist should remove that lesion.

Caution: Just for the reason that the dermatologist removed the lesion, he didn't essentially conduct a biopsy. Dermatologists send both excisions along with biopsies to pathology, but you must report a biopsy: CPT 11100 (Biopsy of skin, subcutaneous tissue and/or mucous membrane [including simple closure], unless otherwise listed; single lesion) only in case the dermatologist gets a diagnosis (for instance, 172.x, Malignant melanoma of skin) from the pathology report.

In case the dermatologist actually carried out an excision and did not performed a biopsy, you must report the procedure with an excision code (11400-11646)

2. What is the quantity of the lesion that the dermatologist removed?

The lesion's size or depth generally dictates the removal method. Dermatologists generally carry out superficial shaves to entirely remove lesions for instance surface moles. However in other occurrences, the dermatologist will carry out an excision to get a portion of a more serious lesion, for instance a cyst-like lesion underneath the skin's surface.

In this case, the dermatologist excises a part of the lesion and then sends the specimen to pathology. Then should you code an excision or a biopsy?

Answer: You must report a biopsy code as the dermatologist took only a portion of the lesion meant for a pathology diagnosis. Consequently, in this case, you must bill code CPT 11100 for a single lesion, and add-on code +11101 (… each separate/additional lesion [list separately in addition to code for primary procedure]) in case the dermatologist takes a sample from more than one lesion.

Don't miss: As add-on codes denote the procedures the physician carried out along with a primary service/procedure, you should never report them as individual codes or you will face denials.

Ensure that you look at CPT's parenthetical instructions, which generally inform you which procedure codes you can use along with the add-on code.

Extra: In case the documentation does not evidently state the specimen's size (for instance, the whole lesion or just a sampling), you can always wait for the particulars of the pathology report before you define which code to use: CPT 11100 or CPT 11400 (Excision, benign lesion including margins, except skin tag [unless listed elsewhere], trunk, arms or legs; excised diameter 0.5 cm or less).

Source URL :- http://www.supercoder.com/coding-newsletters/my-dermatology-coding-alert/procedures-intent-makes-or-breaks-your-11100-reimbursement-article

CPT® 2012 Contains Intradermal Flu Vaccine Option With 90654

Don't overlook revisions to other vaccine, E/M codes.

CPT® 2012 will go into effect in a few weeks, so you must prepare yourself now for new and revised choices associated with vaccine administration and prolonged E/M service to make sure your claims stay correct. Read this article for an ICD-9 and CPT 2012 expert insight for accurate claims and maximized ethical reimbursement.

Official Addition of 90654

CPT® 2012 adds a different option to your flu vaccine coding by adding 90654 (Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, preservative-free, for intradermal use). The inclusion expands on the code family 90655-90668 that at present addressed influenza vaccines.

A couple of factors separate 90654 from a lot of of the other flu vaccine codes:

Code 90654 is not age specific, while codes 90655-90658 do identify the patient's age (either 6 to 35 months of age, or age 3 years and older).

Code 90654 denotes an intradermal injection (administered to the dermal layer of skin), however additional codes (e.g. 90655-90658 and 90662) describe intramuscular injections (administered to muscle tissue) as well as intranasal administration (e.g. 90660).

ICD-9 and CPT Tip: Code 90654 signifies just the vaccine product. Include the fitting administration code (90460-90474) on your claim. In case your physician delivers a noteworthy, distinctly identifiable E/M service in the encounter for the vaccine, also report the suitable E/M code (99201-99205 for a new patient or 99211-99215 for an established patient).

Though 2012 will be the first time 90654 is covered in the CPT® book, the code has been present for more than a year.

Ace ICD-9 and CPT 2012: Note Extra Specificity of 90460-90461

A number of additional vaccine as well as vaccine administration codes go through revision for CPT® 2012. Revised codes involve (underline indicates change):

90460 -- Immunization administration over 18 years of age through any route of administration, including counseling by a physician or added qualified health care professional; first or only component of each vaccine or toxoidadministered.

+90461 -- ... every single additional vaccine or toxoid component which is administered (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)

90581 -- Anthrax vaccine, meant for subcutaneous or intramuscular use

90644 -- Meningococcal conjugate vaccine, as well as serogroups C & Y along with Hemophilus influenza B vaccine (Hib-MenCY), a 4 dose schedule, while administered to children who are 2-15 months of age, for intramuscular use.

ICD-9 and CPT Expert Tip: CPT 2012 removes vaccine codes 90470 (H1N1 immunization administration [intramuscular, intranasal [including counseling when performed) and 90663 (Influenza virus vaccine, pandemic formulation, H1N1). These codes were possibly considered no longer required, particularly with the inclusion of codes 90664-90668 in 2011.

Source URL :- http://www.supercoder.com/coding-newsletters/my-family-practice-coding-alert/code-changes-cpt-2012-includes-intradermal-flu-vaccine-option-with-90654-108687-article

Use 11100/11101 for pathology specimens only

In case you're reporting biopsy codes CPT 11100 and CPT 11101 distinctly from excisions or additional biopsies, you're unknowingly going in the trap of denials and even a possible audit. In order to side-step these problems, you must use 11100/11101 when the surgeon gets a portion of a lesion for pathology only. Read the following article and know when you should use these biopsy skin add-on codes to ensure accurate claims.

Instructional notes make it clear that you must not report CPT 11100 (Biopsy of skin, subcutaneous tissue and/or mucous membrane [including simple closure], unless otherwise listed; single lesion) and +11101 (… each separate/additional lesion [list separately in addition to code for primary procedure]) along with excision or other biopsy codes,

Notes prior to the “Biopsy" portion of CPT say:

You should report CPT 11100 as well as CPT 11101 only when the physician gets hold of a specimen: For instance, the surgeon does away with a part of a patient's skin lesion (709.1, Vascular disorders of skin) and then sends the specimen to pathology. In that particular case, you would certainly use CPT 11100. You must then allocate add-on code 11101 in combination with 11100 when the surgeon conducts a biopsy of a second lesion. You may report one added unit of CPT 11101 for each additional biopsy the surgeon carries out.

Source URL :- http://www.supercoder.com/coding-newsletters/my-general-surgery-coding-alert/biopsy-and-excision-at-the-same-time-think-again-article

You can't report CPT 11100 and CPT 11101 when you bill for a different procedure, for instance an excision. For instance, assume that the surgeon get rid of a whole lesion and after that submits it to pathology, you must then use only 11400 (Excision, benign lesion including margins, except skin tag [unless listed elsewhere], trunk, arms or legs; excised diameter 0.5 cm or less). You are not supposed to use a biopsy code, as according to CPT, the biopsy is a component of 11400.

When the surgeon carries out a biopsy on a dissimilar site from the excision, you may separately assign CPT 11100 and CPT 11101. For instance, your surgeon does away with an all-inclusive benign lesion from a patient's arm, and also a part of a lesion on a patient's neck. As far as the arm lesion is concerned, use 11400, and as far as neck biopsy is concerned, report 11100-59 (Distinct procedural service). By means of appending modifier -59 to the second code, you specify that the biopsy took place at a distinct location from the lesion removal.

Have Comprehensive Knowledge of CPT, HCPCS, and ICD-9-CM

The interest in ICD-10-CM training is at a high level with most coders, which is not going to stop till October 1, 2013, implementation date. We are constantly seeing the drive for education careening to ICD-10-CM; however, but ICD-9-CM isn't supposed to be left behind.

Coders should be well-versed with their coding manuals. Remember, outpatient coding is not simply about CPT coding, but it is relatively about conceptualizing the whole picture in conjunction with CPT and ICD-9-CM codes. ICD-9-CM has a comprehensive listing of guidelines similar to the CPT manual. Interpreting ICD-9-CM knowledge prevents coders from fully understanding why diagnosis codes are used or sequenced in a specific way to produce complete claims. A coder must have a well-rounded knowledge of CPT, HCPCS, and ICD-9-CM. This will lead to fewer denials owing to ICD-9-CM mismatches with the CPT codes chosen.

The basics of ICD-9-CM should be well known; though, let's evaluate the important steps coders are required to take in order to correctly report the diagnosis for the following example.

A patient was admitted after developing severe diarrhea on day 50 following a living donor kidney transplant. A stool sample revealed a significant number of donor lymphocytes due to acute graft-vs.-host (GVH) disease. The physician diagnosed the patient with acute GVH disease.

First, find the main entry term; in this scenario, let's look at GVH disease. Keep in mind, conditions are expressed in the documentation as well as the index as nouns, adjectives, and eponyms. Numerous synonyms are also used for some circumstances, letting a coder to find the precise code through numerous lookup methods.

The next step is to look at the code found in the tabular section of the index to confirm correct code selection. Here, you will find the code 279.50. If you look under this code, it explains that in case this is a complication because of organ transplant not somewhere else classified, see Complications, transplant, organ. Although this is a complication arising from a kidney transplant, you will still necessitate reporting the GVH disease, so look at the tabular section for code 279.50, where you will get 279.51, which precisely reports the disease documented at the maximum specificity.

Prior to applying 279.51 to the claim, you need to carry out one additional step. Most coders overlook to look around the code to see in case there is any parenthetical information that may affect the coding. Possibly an added code is needed to report a manifestation or if the code comprises or not comprises a condition or disease. It may also have the instruction to code the underlying disease first.

This example requires the use of an ICD-9 information is brought to you by SuperCoder.com. Log on to www.supercoder.com for more accurate and profitable expert medical coding and billing advice.

CPT 2012: 62310, 62318 Revisions Help Simplify Your Single Shot vs. Indwelling Catheter Coding

Plus: Get ready for changes to 77003, too.

Though you won't report new or revised CPT® anesthesia codes until January 2012, get ready -- and your anesthesia providers -- at this time for revisions that can impact your everyday coding, for instance the rewording of two general epidural codes.

Observe the Descriptor Differences

The chief modifications are applicable to epidural codes 62310 along with 62318. The existing and upcoming descriptors are as follows:

The novel descriptors include several changes:

62310 specifies that it can be used for more than one single injection.

62310 no longer statesthe possible use for epidurography. Epidurography is a distinct procedure that doesn't need to be associated with this code.

The existing version of 62310 doesn't involve catheter administration, however the revised descriptor does. Physicians were placing catheters for single shots and trying to bill 62310 or 62311. The dissimilarity is that one pair of anesthesia codes is for constant or continuous bolus (62318/62319). The other is for a single distinct dose at a time (62310/62311), irrespective of catheter use.

The revised 62318 explains "indwelling" catheter and changes from "injection" to "injections".

Keep in mind: Anesthesia codes 62311 as well as 62319 now read "lumbar or sacral (caudal)" in place of "lumbar; sacral (caudal)."


Source URL :- http://www.supercoder.com/coding-newsletters/my-anesthesia-coding-alert/cpt-2012-62310-62318-revisions-help-clarify-your-single-shot-vs-indwelling-catheter-coding-108625-article

Don't Miss Fluoro and Nerve Destruction Changes

In case you occasionally report 77003 (Fluoroscopic guidance and localization of needle or catheter tip for spine or paraspinous diagnostic or therapeutic injection procedures [epidural, subarachnoid, or sacroiliac joint], including neurolytic agent destruction) in combination with diagnostic or therapeutic injections, make certain that you note the descriptor change, come January.

The novel descriptor will read "Fluoroscopic guidance and localization or needle or catheter tip for spine or paraspinous diagnostic or therapeutic injection procedures (epidural or subarachnoid)."

Change: The code no longer covers guidance for sacroiliac joint injections or neurolytic agent destruction.

Replacements: Codes 64622-64627 for paravertebral facet joint nerve destruction have been deleted and replaced with following listed four novel anesthesia codes :

64633 – i.e. Destruction by means of neurolytic agent, paravertebral facet joint nerve(s) including imaging guidance (fluoroscopy or CT); cervical or thoracic, as well as single facet joint

64634 -- i.e.... cervical or thoracic, every additional facet joint (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)

64635 -- i.e.... lumbar or sacral, as well as single facet joint

64636 -- i.e.... lumbar or sacral, every additional facet joint (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure).

ICD-9 Coding: 700 Basics: Simplify Corn and Callus Coding

Learn what to do when these lesser-known terms show up in your doctor's documentation?

For dermatologists who are treating the skin of a patient's foot, one of the most generally coded diagnoses is corns (and calluses). This particular condition has a slew of puzzling names that may be difficult to find -- or may not be present in your ICD-9 coding book -- and could quickly overturn your claims.

Decoding all of the corn and callus terminology can be particularly complex in case you work for numerous physicians and each one has his own particular way of naming the same thing, or in case you've lately started working at another practice. But you no longer have to be ignorant as far as a callus-related term is concerned.

Watch out: "Tylosis" could lead you down the erroneous coding path if you're not cautious. The ICD-9 index present in the front of the coding book presents numerous options, for instance 757.39 (Other specified amomalies of skin; other; includes accessory skin tags, congenital; congenital scar; epidermolysis bullosa; keratoderma [congenital]), and this is the incorrect path for a basic corn or callus. The best way you encounter this particular term present in the documentation is to ask the dermatologist to explain the condition.

ICD-10: Once ICD-9 changes to ICD-10 in October, 2013, code 700 become invalid. In its place, you would report ICD-10 code L84 (Corns and callosities).

Ace the Definitions

In case you're still uncertain about your dermatologist's everyday explanation of these general conditions, learning the definitions of "corn" and "callus" will help. Remember, a corn is a small, horny area of the skin produced by local pressure (e.g., a shoe or hosiery) irritating the tissue over a bony prominence.

Corns normally takes place on a toe, where they form "hard corns." (Between the toes, pressure can form a soft corn of macerated skin, which often yellows.)

Moreover, a callus is localized thickening and enlargement of the horny layer of the skin because of pressure or friction. Normally, calluses as well as corns can result in pain, and soft-tissue inflammation may take place around the base of the lesion.

Knowing these definitions is also supportive in case you plan to ask the dermatologist for explanation.

For instance: You're struggling with how you should code a patient diagnosis that defines a "keratosis" of the bottom of the great toe and the heel. You've learned the synonyms for corns/calluses and recall that this is one more name for a callus, however you notice that a different nearby code has the identical word in its descriptor: 701.1 (Keratoderma, acquired; Keratosis [blennorrhagica]).

For an error-free ICD-9 coding , you request the dermatologist for more particulars about the patient's condition so you can code it correctly, and he defines a basic thickening of the skin owing to bad shoes. After studying the definitions, now you know that it's just a callus and you can further code it as 700.

For More Information :- http://www.supercoder.com/coding-newsletters/my-dermatology-coding-alert/icd-9-coding-700-basics-take-the-rough-edge-off-corn-and-callus-coding-108680-article

Get Well-Versed With NCCI v17.1: The Version Includes Thousands of New Edits

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has released the latest National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) update this year. Version 17.1 comprises more than 700,000 code pair edits. Amongst those NCCI edits, nearly 12,000 are new to Version 17.1. About 350 code pair edits have been removed, the majority of which are retroactive to earlier dates of service.

Retroactive code pair deletions may imply that you're entitled for payment on past claims, in case those claims were overruled based on the now-deleted code pair edits.

Version 17.1 is noteworthy for another reason: For the first time ever, Medicaid payers will have to observe NCCI edits. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590, section 65607) necessitates that state Medicaid programs must include NCCI methodologies into their claims processing systems.

The objective of NCCI is to stop payments when inappropriate code combinations (unbundling) are reported. NCCI comprises two types of NCCI edits: The first of these edits are essentially the bundling edits, named "column 1/column 2" or "correct coding" edits. Codes which are listed in column 2 generally are bundled to the code listed in column 1, which is essentially the "more extensive" procedure. For instance, "CPT® code 36000 Introduction of needle or intracatheter in a vein is essential to every nuclear medicine procedure necessitating injection of a radiopharmaceutical into a vein. CPT® code 36000 is not distinctly reportable with these sorts of nuclear medicine procedures. Though, CPT® code 36000 might be reported alone in case the lone service delivered is the inclusion of a needle into a vein, as per the Correct Coding Initiative Policy Manual.

The second kind of NCCI edits, named "mutually exclusive edits," defines code pairs that will not practically be conducted at the same session along with anatomic location for the similar patient. As per the Correct Coding Initiative Policy Manual clarifies, "An instance of a mutually exclusive condition is the repair of an organ that can be carried out by two dissimilar methods. Merely one method can be selected to repair the organ. A second instance is a service that can be reported either as an ‘initial' service or a ‘subsequent' service. With the exclusion of drug administration services, the initial service along with subsequent service should not be reported at the same patient encounter."

You'll certainly want to ensure that you always refer to the most current version of NCCI when checking for code bundles. CMS updates the NCCI each quarter and posts the broad list of NCCI edits as a free download. You also may buy a subscription to NCCI, in either an electronic or a paper format, from National Technical Information Service (NTIS).