When you are thinking about prolonged service codes 99358-99359 for your evaluation and management (E/M) services, you'll come face to face with yet another common pediatric coding challenge. Since last year, you have been able to count indirect prolonged service time that takes place around the date of the E/M service.
As per the previous definition (year 2009 and before), the non-face-to-face service had to be the day of the evaluation and management visit. But then since the first day of last year, you simply have to prove that the time was 'related' to the evaluation & management service.
Word of caution: Prolonged service codes 99358 and +99359 still have to relate to an E/M service that involves patient contact.
As per the revised notes, the prolonged service must related to a service or patient where direct patient care has taken place or will occur and relate to ongoing patient management. According to CPT, there are no timeframe on the time that can elapse between the primary service and the prolonged prior to and after direct patient care service.
If you are tending to a complex child, the loosening of the prolonged non-face-to-face service codes has been a great help. You can assess the patient's chart and make phone calls prior to and after seeing the patient and count that time. You need a minimum of 30 minutes to bill the first hour of prolonged non-face-to-face care.
What if you are using electronic billing? If so, you may miss the opportunity to add 'related' prolonged service tomes to your claims. With electronic billing, the encounter is sent directly to the front office and the bill is sent out then and there.
What you need to do: You have to work with the practice management staff to ensure that you are holding the claim until all of the extra work related to the E/M visit is done and you are holding the claim until all of the additional work related to that E/M visit is finished and documented.
Showing posts with label E/M service. Show all posts
Showing posts with label E/M service. Show all posts
Monday, August 1, 2011
Monday, July 25, 2011
Closures: 12001 or 13100? Consider More Than Layers to Code Correct Closure Level
Follow our tips to dig deeper and find the differences between 'simple,' 'intermediate,' and 'complex.'
All closures aren't created equal; one of the nuances of coding these procedures is knowing how to distinguish one type from another. Read on for our experts' advice on how to assess the three closure levels and assign the best codes.
Remember 'Simple' Doesn't Mean 'Easy'
A simple repair involves primarily the dermis and epidermis. It might involve subcutaneous tissues, but not deep layers.
Draw the line: How do you know when a closure might involve subcutaneous layers but is still considered a simple repair? Your provider's documentation is the key. The difference is whether the wound is closed in layers or just a single layer, experts note. The provider might decide to include the subcutaneous layer in the closure but does so by bringing the needle through the dermis into the subcutaneous and back. That results in a single-layer closure rather than closing the subcutaneous layer first and then the dermis/epidermis second in separate closure techniques.
But "simple" doesn't mean the repair is something anyone could do. Simple repairs involve one-layer closure, which helps set them apart from a standard E/M procedure. Simple repair also includes "local anesthesia, and chemical or electrocauterization of wounds not closed," says Dilsia Santiago, CCS, CCS-P, a coder in Reading, Pa.
For example, if your dermatologist uses adhesive strips to close a laceration, consider it an E/M service that you'll report with the best-fitting choice from CPT codes 99201-99205 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of a new patient) or 99211-99215 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient). Most Steri-strip applications are done by nursing staff; but even if the physician applies them, they're included in the E/M service .
If, however, your dermatologist uses sutures, staples, or tissue adhesives to close the laceration, consider it a separate procedure. Choose your code from 12001-12007 (Simple repair of superficial wounds of scalp, neck, axillae, eternal genitalia, trunk and/or extremities [including hands and feet]) or 12011-12018 (Simple repair of superficial wounds of face, ears, eyelids, nose, lips and/or mucous membranes), based on the lesion's location and size.
Measuring tip: For excision of soft tissue tumors, measure the longest dimension of an oblong mass, according to John P. Heiner, MD, professor at University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics in Madison.
Medicare exception: Guidelines change when your physician performs a single-layer laceration repair on a Medicare patient. You'll report G0168 (Wound closure utilizing tissue adhesive[s] only) instead of reporting standard CPT codes. If your physician uses sutures instead of tissue adhesive for Medicare patients, turn back to the standard suture/repair codes.
Source URL :- http://www.supercoder.com/coding-newsletters/my-dermatology-coding-alert/closures-12001-or-13100-consider-more-than-layers-to-code-correct-closure-level-article
Jerry Salley, CPC, has over six years' experience writing about coding, focusing especially on ophthalmology coding with The Coding Institute's Ophthalmology Coding Alert . He has also written about optometry, gastroenterology, dermatology, audiology, and urology coding, as well as Joint Commission accreditation, healthcare human resources, and behavioral healthcare reimbursement issues. A graduate of Furman University, Jerry is a certified professional coder through the American Academy of Professional Coders.
All closures aren't created equal; one of the nuances of coding these procedures is knowing how to distinguish one type from another. Read on for our experts' advice on how to assess the three closure levels and assign the best codes.
Remember 'Simple' Doesn't Mean 'Easy'
A simple repair involves primarily the dermis and epidermis. It might involve subcutaneous tissues, but not deep layers.
Draw the line: How do you know when a closure might involve subcutaneous layers but is still considered a simple repair? Your provider's documentation is the key. The difference is whether the wound is closed in layers or just a single layer, experts note. The provider might decide to include the subcutaneous layer in the closure but does so by bringing the needle through the dermis into the subcutaneous and back. That results in a single-layer closure rather than closing the subcutaneous layer first and then the dermis/epidermis second in separate closure techniques.
But "simple" doesn't mean the repair is something anyone could do. Simple repairs involve one-layer closure, which helps set them apart from a standard E/M procedure. Simple repair also includes "local anesthesia, and chemical or electrocauterization of wounds not closed," says Dilsia Santiago, CCS, CCS-P, a coder in Reading, Pa.
For example, if your dermatologist uses adhesive strips to close a laceration, consider it an E/M service that you'll report with the best-fitting choice from CPT codes 99201-99205 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of a new patient) or 99211-99215 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient). Most Steri-strip applications are done by nursing staff; but even if the physician applies them, they're included in the E/M service .
If, however, your dermatologist uses sutures, staples, or tissue adhesives to close the laceration, consider it a separate procedure. Choose your code from 12001-12007 (Simple repair of superficial wounds of scalp, neck, axillae, eternal genitalia, trunk and/or extremities [including hands and feet]) or 12011-12018 (Simple repair of superficial wounds of face, ears, eyelids, nose, lips and/or mucous membranes), based on the lesion's location and size.
Measuring tip: For excision of soft tissue tumors, measure the longest dimension of an oblong mass, according to John P. Heiner, MD, professor at University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics in Madison.
Medicare exception: Guidelines change when your physician performs a single-layer laceration repair on a Medicare patient. You'll report G0168 (Wound closure utilizing tissue adhesive[s] only) instead of reporting standard CPT codes. If your physician uses sutures instead of tissue adhesive for Medicare patients, turn back to the standard suture/repair codes.
Source URL :- http://www.supercoder.com/coding-newsletters/my-dermatology-coding-alert/closures-12001-or-13100-consider-more-than-layers-to-code-correct-closure-level-article
Jerry Salley, CPC, has over six years' experience writing about coding, focusing especially on ophthalmology coding with The Coding Institute's Ophthalmology Coding Alert . He has also written about optometry, gastroenterology, dermatology, audiology, and urology coding, as well as Joint Commission accreditation, healthcare human resources, and behavioral healthcare reimbursement issues. A graduate of Furman University, Jerry is a certified professional coder through the American Academy of Professional Coders.
Sunday, July 10, 2011
Phototherapy: 96900 or 96910? The Answer Could Mean $70 for Each Vitiligo Treatment
Avoid misrepresenting phototherapy services by following this expert advice.
Is your dermatologist treating vitiligo or dychromia patients with phototherapy? If so, you need to dig into your physician's documentation to determine what type of light, wavelength, and materials he used. Check out these two frequently asked questions and combat both E/M and multiequipment correct coding initiative (CCI) situations with this expert advice.
Evaluate These Phototherapy + E/M Tips
If you're charging for an office visit on the same day as phototherapy, your reimbursement may depend on whether your physician's documentation warrants a different diagnosis code. Payers may reimburse at times if the doctor sees the patient for a different problem, thus with a different diagnosis code, experts say.
Example: If your physician performs 99212 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient ... Physicians typically spend 10 minutes face-to-face with the patient and/or family) with phototherapy, you will bill it with modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) on the E/M service. You can only consider reporting modifier 25 when coding an E/M service, Janet Palazzo, CPC, a coder in Cherry Hill, N.J., says. Remember your E/M documentation has to show medical necessity for the additional work.
Note: If you reported the nurse visit code 99211 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, that may not require the presence of a physician ...), your payer would likely consider it bundled into the light treatment.
Ask 2 Questions to Choose Best Light Therapy Code
For patients with vitiligo (709.01), your dermatologist may use narrow band UVB phototherapy.
The dermatologist administers phototherapy two to three times per week for several months until the patient achieves repigmentation of the skin. For this procedure, you need to pinpoint what types the physician used (UVA, UVB) and the varying wavelengths.
To choose the appropriate code, ask yourself these two questions:
Is your dermatologist treating vitiligo or dychromia patients with phototherapy? If so, you need to dig into your physician's documentation to determine what type of light, wavelength, and materials he used. Check out these two frequently asked questions and combat both E/M and multiequipment correct coding initiative (CCI) situations with this expert advice.
Evaluate These Phototherapy + E/M Tips
If you're charging for an office visit on the same day as phototherapy, your reimbursement may depend on whether your physician's documentation warrants a different diagnosis code. Payers may reimburse at times if the doctor sees the patient for a different problem, thus with a different diagnosis code, experts say.
Example: If your physician performs 99212 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient ... Physicians typically spend 10 minutes face-to-face with the patient and/or family) with phototherapy, you will bill it with modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) on the E/M service. You can only consider reporting modifier 25 when coding an E/M service, Janet Palazzo, CPC, a coder in Cherry Hill, N.J., says. Remember your E/M documentation has to show medical necessity for the additional work.
Note: If you reported the nurse visit code 99211 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, that may not require the presence of a physician ...), your payer would likely consider it bundled into the light treatment.
Ask 2 Questions to Choose Best Light Therapy Code
For patients with vitiligo (709.01), your dermatologist may use narrow band UVB phototherapy.
The dermatologist administers phototherapy two to three times per week for several months until the patient achieves repigmentation of the skin. For this procedure, you need to pinpoint what types the physician used (UVA, UVB) and the varying wavelengths.
To choose the appropriate code, ask yourself these two questions:
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
Strategies for Reporting E/M Services & Minor Surgical Procedures Using TP RULES
Want to ensure your ob-gyn gets paid for E/M services and minor surgical procedures performed in a teaching setting? Well you can ensure it so long as you know the requirements for Medicare's teaching physician rules.
Here are some sure-fire strategies for reporting E/M services and minor surgical procedures using the teaching physician rules.
a) You should report outpatient services based on 'key portions'. Think that the TP provides an E/M service such as an office visit (99201-99215) without the resident present. The TP may be able to use some of the resident's work under TP guideline.
Here's how: If the resident also carried out the E/M service the TP carried out, your ob-gyn would have to duplicate the 'critical and key portions' of the resident's services to bill under this guideline. The TP should define and be able to defend those critical and key portions.
b) You should ensure resident's presence for evaluations
If the resident didn't attend the TP's patient evaluation and also did not carry out a complete evaluation and management service, the TP must bill and document the office visit as he would in a nonteaching setting. To put it in other words, to support a 99202 claim, the ob-gyn would have to document an expanded problem-focused history, an expanded problem-focused exam, and straightforward medical decision-making.
c) Thirdly, you should document ob-gyn presence for critical care. Documentation requirements for the claims are high however an ob-gyn can also code when he and the resident perform critical care jointly.
d) You should also let supervision guide surgical claims. When you report minor surgeries and endoscopic procedures, you should ensure the ob-gyn documents that he directly supervised the entire procedure. That means the physician must be present in the room. For instance, he cannot view the session through a monitor in another room.
e) You should keep the primary-care exception in mind. If your ob-gyn is also treating a primary-care clinic patient, you might be able to use the primary-care exception rule.
To put it in a nutshell, Medicare allows a TP to get paid when a resident provides an E/M service without the TP's direct supervision. These cases must fall under the MCM's primary-care exception, which refers to E/M new patient codes 99201-99203 and established patient codes 99211-99213.
For further details on which modifier to use for primary care exception and for other ob-gyn coding updates, sign up for a one-stop medical coding guide like Supercoder.com "http://www.supercoder.com"
Here are some sure-fire strategies for reporting E/M services and minor surgical procedures using the teaching physician rules.
a) You should report outpatient services based on 'key portions'. Think that the TP provides an E/M service such as an office visit (99201-99215) without the resident present. The TP may be able to use some of the resident's work under TP guideline.
Here's how: If the resident also carried out the E/M service the TP carried out, your ob-gyn would have to duplicate the 'critical and key portions' of the resident's services to bill under this guideline. The TP should define and be able to defend those critical and key portions.
b) You should ensure resident's presence for evaluations
If the resident didn't attend the TP's patient evaluation and also did not carry out a complete evaluation and management service, the TP must bill and document the office visit as he would in a nonteaching setting. To put it in other words, to support a 99202 claim, the ob-gyn would have to document an expanded problem-focused history, an expanded problem-focused exam, and straightforward medical decision-making.
c) Thirdly, you should document ob-gyn presence for critical care. Documentation requirements for the claims are high however an ob-gyn can also code when he and the resident perform critical care jointly.
d) You should also let supervision guide surgical claims. When you report minor surgeries and endoscopic procedures, you should ensure the ob-gyn documents that he directly supervised the entire procedure. That means the physician must be present in the room. For instance, he cannot view the session through a monitor in another room.
e) You should keep the primary-care exception in mind. If your ob-gyn is also treating a primary-care clinic patient, you might be able to use the primary-care exception rule.
To put it in a nutshell, Medicare allows a TP to get paid when a resident provides an E/M service without the TP's direct supervision. These cases must fall under the MCM's primary-care exception, which refers to E/M new patient codes 99201-99203 and established patient codes 99211-99213.
For further details on which modifier to use for primary care exception and for other ob-gyn coding updates, sign up for a one-stop medical coding guide like Supercoder.com "http://www.supercoder.com"
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
CPT Changes Pediatric Critical Transport Code Bundles This Year
This year CPT brought a whole new crop of bundles with pediatric critical care and transport services. As a matter of fact, CPT went retro with pediatric critical care transport codes 99466-99467, reverting the bundles back to the 2007 rules.
CPT 2011 has changed which services are bundled into critical care codes 99291-99292 based on whether a facility or professional reports the services. In addition, CPT has returned the list of services bundled into 99466-99467 to the bundles that were in effect as of 2007.
This year, the following services are included when carried out during the pediatric patient transport by the physician providing critical care and may not be reported separately: Routine monitoring evaluations, interpretation of cardiac output measurements (93562), Chest x-rays (71010-71020), Pulse oximetry (94760-94762), Blood gases and information data stored in computers (for instance, ECGs, blood pressures, hematologic data - 99090), Gastric intubation (43752-43753), Temporary transcutaneous pacing (92953), Ventilatory management (94002-94003, 94660-94662), Vascular access procedures (36000, 36400-36406, 36415, 36591, and 3660
Critical care: In the present year, pediatricians from your practice will still face the following services as being bundled into critical care: interpretations of cardiac output measurements, chest xrays, pulse oximetry, blood gases, information data stored in computers, gastric intubation, temporary transcutaneous pacing, vent management, and vascular access. But then, facilities will be able to report these services separately from critical care and will not face the bundles.
Bear in mind: This means that you can report the critical care code ( Source "http://www.supercoder.com")only, even if the facility is reporting the critical care codes in addition to the separate x-rays, intubation, and other services separately.
You should not report new observation care codes with other E/M service. CPT 2011 adds 99224-99226 as far as coding subsequent observation care is concerned. Even though confusion surrounded these codes when CPT first debuted, recently some rules have come to light on how you can report them.
When to bill: Subsequent observation care starts after the initial observation care DOS.
In addition, you should not report subsequent observation care on the same date as initial observation care codes (99218-99220), nor can you report observation services on the same date as office or emergency department services. What's more, you cannot report the new subsequent observation codes on the same date as observation care discharge (99217).
CPT 2011 has changed which services are bundled into critical care codes 99291-99292 based on whether a facility or professional reports the services. In addition, CPT has returned the list of services bundled into 99466-99467 to the bundles that were in effect as of 2007.
This year, the following services are included when carried out during the pediatric patient transport by the physician providing critical care and may not be reported separately: Routine monitoring evaluations, interpretation of cardiac output measurements (93562), Chest x-rays (71010-71020), Pulse oximetry (94760-94762), Blood gases and information data stored in computers (for instance, ECGs, blood pressures, hematologic data - 99090), Gastric intubation (43752-43753), Temporary transcutaneous pacing (92953), Ventilatory management (94002-94003, 94660-94662), Vascular access procedures (36000, 36400-36406, 36415, 36591, and 3660
Critical care: In the present year, pediatricians from your practice will still face the following services as being bundled into critical care: interpretations of cardiac output measurements, chest xrays, pulse oximetry, blood gases, information data stored in computers, gastric intubation, temporary transcutaneous pacing, vent management, and vascular access. But then, facilities will be able to report these services separately from critical care and will not face the bundles.
Bear in mind: This means that you can report the critical care code ( Source "http://www.supercoder.com")only, even if the facility is reporting the critical care codes in addition to the separate x-rays, intubation, and other services separately.
You should not report new observation care codes with other E/M service. CPT 2011 adds 99224-99226 as far as coding subsequent observation care is concerned. Even though confusion surrounded these codes when CPT first debuted, recently some rules have come to light on how you can report them.
When to bill: Subsequent observation care starts after the initial observation care DOS.
In addition, you should not report subsequent observation care on the same date as initial observation care codes (99218-99220), nor can you report observation services on the same date as office or emergency department services. What's more, you cannot report the new subsequent observation codes on the same date as observation care discharge (99217).
Monday, February 7, 2011
Physician's Intent to Treat Obstruction? Choose 94640
Coding scenario: An established patient with emphysema presents the office complaining of shortness of breath. The pulmonologist provides inhalation treatment and at the same time educates the patient on using the nebulizer at home, and provides an expanded problem-focused examination and medical decision making of low complexity. What code should we use in this situation?
Well, you should consider two CPTs to report this service. In the first instance, you would bill 94640 (Pressurized or nonpressurized inhalation treatment for acute airway obstruction or for sputum induction for diagnostic purposes [example with an aerosol generator, nebulizer, metered dose inhaler or intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) device]) to cover the wide-ranging service the physician provided.
Here's why: The best option is 94640 as the physician's primary intent was to treat the obstruction. If you report 94664 (Demonstration and/or evaluation of patient utilization of an aerosol generator, nebulizer, metered dose inhaler or IPPB device), you would risk a denial.
For the office visit, you should report 99213 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient …) based on your documentation of an expanded problem-focused exam with low complexity decision-making. You might need to add modifier 25 to 99213 to indicate that theE/M service was significant and separately identifiable from 94640.
Coding tip: Even though technically not required, it may help to link separate diagnosis codes to the E/M and the nebulizer treatment. For example, you could link 786.05 (Shortness of breath) to 99213, and link the emphysema code (492.8, Other emphysema) to 94640.
Well, you should consider two CPTs to report this service. In the first instance, you would bill 94640 (Pressurized or nonpressurized inhalation treatment for acute airway obstruction or for sputum induction for diagnostic purposes [example with an aerosol generator, nebulizer, metered dose inhaler or intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) device]) to cover the wide-ranging service the physician provided.
Here's why: The best option is 94640 as the physician's primary intent was to treat the obstruction. If you report 94664 (Demonstration and/or evaluation of patient utilization of an aerosol generator, nebulizer, metered dose inhaler or IPPB device), you would risk a denial.
For the office visit, you should report 99213 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient …) based on your documentation of an expanded problem-focused exam with low complexity decision-making. You might need to add modifier 25 to 99213 to indicate that theE/M service was significant and separately identifiable from 94640.
Coding tip: Even though technically not required, it may help to link separate diagnosis codes to the E/M and the nebulizer treatment. For example, you could link 786.05 (Shortness of breath) to 99213, and link the emphysema code (492.8, Other emphysema) to 94640.
Thursday, January 27, 2011
CCI 17.0 Takes Aim at Just-In Vaccine Administration Codes
The latest CCI edits (17.0) that went into effect on January 1 this year include 19,822 new active pairs and 9.778 code pair deletions. Many of the new code pair additions involve CPT codes that debuted on January 1, with CCI now halting payment if you report certain procedures together.
For example, you will find vaccine administration codes 90471 and 90473 bundled into new vaccine administration code 90460 and no modifier can separate these edits. This edit prevents mixing and matching the new immunization administration codes with the old, established immunization administration codes when delivering multiple vaccines at the same visit.
What's more, CCI bundles the new new subsequent observation care codes 99224-99226 into inpatient neonatal and pediatric critical care codes 99468-99476.
Good news on the modifier front
Not all news coming out of the latest CCI edits is bad. With effect from January 1, you will be able to use a modifier (such as 59, Distinct procedural service) to separate the edit bundling wound care management codes 97597-97602 into the just-revised debridement codes 11042-11044. Earlier, if your pediatrician performed both procedures on the same DOS, you could not collect for both no matter what; however now you'll be able to if your documentation demonstrates the separate and distinct nature of the services and you use the proper modifier.
Swapped pairs: To add to it, CCI did an about-face on several edits this round. Previously, if you reported 94660 or 94662 with an outpatient E/M code (99201-99215), CCI would reimburse you for the pressure ventilation and deny the E/M service. But then CCI version 17.0 now makes the E/M service the primary code, and the pressure ventilation code will be denied if you report the services together. These edits cannot be separated by any modifier.
For example, you will find vaccine administration codes 90471 and 90473 bundled into new vaccine administration code 90460 and no modifier can separate these edits. This edit prevents mixing and matching the new immunization administration codes with the old, established immunization administration codes when delivering multiple vaccines at the same visit.
What's more, CCI bundles the new new subsequent observation care codes 99224-99226 into inpatient neonatal and pediatric critical care codes 99468-99476.
Good news on the modifier front
Not all news coming out of the latest CCI edits is bad. With effect from January 1, you will be able to use a modifier (such as 59, Distinct procedural service) to separate the edit bundling wound care management codes 97597-97602 into the just-revised debridement codes 11042-11044. Earlier, if your pediatrician performed both procedures on the same DOS, you could not collect for both no matter what; however now you'll be able to if your documentation demonstrates the separate and distinct nature of the services and you use the proper modifier.
Swapped pairs: To add to it, CCI did an about-face on several edits this round. Previously, if you reported 94660 or 94662 with an outpatient E/M code (99201-99215), CCI would reimburse you for the pressure ventilation and deny the E/M service. But then CCI version 17.0 now makes the E/M service the primary code, and the pressure ventilation code will be denied if you report the services together. These edits cannot be separated by any modifier.
Tips to Help You Achieve G0438, G0439 Coding Success
Here are five tips to stop denials and keep your annual visit claims picture perfect this year.
Apply G0438 to second year of coverage
Be wary of applying these codes to new Medicare patients coming in to your doctor's practice this year. This is because Medicare will only reimburse the initial visit (G0438) during the second year the patient is eligible for Medicare Part B. Simply put, during the first year of the patient's coverage, Medicare will only cover the Initial Preventive Physical Exam (IPPE), also known as the Welcome to Medicare exam.
Be wary of applying these codes to new Medicare patients coming in to your doctor's practice this year. This is because Medicare will only reimburse the initial visit (G0438) during the second year the patient is eligible for Medicare Part B. Simply put, during the first year of the patient's coverage, Medicare will only cover the Initial Preventive Physical Exam (IPPE), also known as the Welcome to Medicare exam.
CMS limits G0438 to one physician
If your FP sees the patient for the initial visit (G0438) and the patient sees a different physician during the next annual wellness visit, that second physician will only get reimbursement for the subsequent visit (G0439), despite never having seen the patient before.
Reason: CMS has indicated that when a patient returns to the same or new physician in a third year, they might only pay for the subsequent visit. As such, it's vital that you convey this information to any new physician the patient goes to.
If your FP sees the patient for the initial visit (G0438) and the patient sees a different physician during the next annual wellness visit, that second physician will only get reimbursement for the subsequent visit (G0439), despite never having seen the patient before.
Reason: CMS has indicated that when a patient returns to the same or new physician in a third year, they might only pay for the subsequent visit. As such, it's vital that you convey this information to any new physician the patient goes to.
Add preventive services codes, if performed
You can bill the new annual visit codes in addition to any other preventive service such as G0102 and/or Q0091 in the covered year.
Remember: You won't need to append any modifier for this combination as the G codes are not problem-oriented E/M services to which that modifier applies. If you do report the annual codes with a problem-oriented E/M service (with modifier 25 appended to the problem-oriented code), CMS indicates that this situation should be rare, owing to the nature of the wellness visit requirements which are very time intensive. They also expect that given these requirements, you'll not bill the patient for a non-covered preventive service in addition.
You can bill the new annual visit codes in addition to any other preventive service such as G0102 and/or Q0091 in the covered year.
Remember: You won't need to append any modifier for this combination as the G codes are not problem-oriented E/M services to which that modifier applies. If you do report the annual codes with a problem-oriented E/M service (with modifier 25 appended to the problem-oriented code), CMS indicates that this situation should be rare, owing to the nature of the wellness visit requirements which are very time intensive. They also expect that given these requirements, you'll not bill the patient for a non-covered preventive service in addition.
Document the required elements
Prior to billing the new annual visit codes, the physician or physician team must document certain elements.
Prior to billing the new annual visit codes, the physician or physician team must document certain elements.
CMS waives the deductible and copay
Under provisions listed in the ACA, all plans covered by the rules contained in the Act must offer coverage of a comprehensive range of preventive services that are recommended by experts and the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) with a grade of A (strongly recommends) or grade B (recommends). This means these codes fall under coverage that doesn't impose any costsharing requirements.
For more tips to keep your annual visit claims picture perfect, sign up for a one-stop medical coding guide like Supercoder.com
Under provisions listed in the ACA, all plans covered by the rules contained in the Act must offer coverage of a comprehensive range of preventive services that are recommended by experts and the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) with a grade of A (strongly recommends) or grade B (recommends). This means these codes fall under coverage that doesn't impose any costsharing requirements.
For more tips to keep your annual visit claims picture perfect, sign up for a one-stop medical coding guide like Supercoder.com
Sunday, November 14, 2010
FAQ to Boost Your Pain Management ICD-9 Coding
FAQ to boost your pain management ICD-9 coding
If you do not know how many diagnosis codes you can report, you could find yourself assigning the wrong code. Here's a question followed by the answer that'll help you get quick tips to help your pain management ICD-9 coding:
How many diagnosis codes are 'too many'?
Question: Our pain management specialist treated a patient with diabetes, however he was actually seeing the patient to treat a complication of the diabetic polyneuropathy. During his evaluation, the doctor also noted that the patient has shoulder joint inflammation. Should we use the neuropathy complication only or several ICD-9 codes to represent various conditions of the patient?
Answer: Normally, the primary diagnosis code that you list on your claim should represent the main reason for the encounter, or the condition with the highest risk of morbidity/mortality that the physician tends to during the visit. However, when you deal with a condition like diabetes, the situation changes.
Section 1.A.6 of the ICD-9-CM official
Guidelines for coding and reporting certain conditions have both an underlying etiology and multiple body system manifestations owing to the underlying etiology. For conditions such as this, the ICD-9-CM(http://www.supercoder.com/icd9-codes/) has a coding convention that requires that the underlying condition be sequenced first after the manifestation.
If a patient has more than one manifestation of diabetes, more than one code from category 250 may be used with as many manifestation codes as are needed to describe the patient's diabetic condition fully.
As such, you should first use 250.6x (Diabetes with neurological manifestations). Remember to add a fifth digit to reflect the patient's type of diabetes and status of control. Your secondary code should represent the specific pain manifestation being treated. In this case, you should report 357.2 (Polyneuropathy in diabetes) as the secondary diagnosis. As because your pain practitioner documented joint inflammation, you should also report the right code describing that condition (716.91, Arthropathy, unspecified; shoulder region).
Why so many codes: Even though many payers will link only the first, main diagnosis code that you list to support the provided service's medical necessity, reporting all the diagnoses that follow the HIPAA-mandated guidelines is compliant coding. As of July 2007, Medicare must accept up to eight diagnoses for each electronic claim reported. The additional diagnoses might indicate more complex presenting problems and can provide the help you might need for a higher-level E/M service.
If you do not know how many diagnosis codes you can report, you could find yourself assigning the wrong code. Here's a question followed by the answer that'll help you get quick tips to help your pain management ICD-9 coding:
How many diagnosis codes are 'too many'?
Question: Our pain management specialist treated a patient with diabetes, however he was actually seeing the patient to treat a complication of the diabetic polyneuropathy. During his evaluation, the doctor also noted that the patient has shoulder joint inflammation. Should we use the neuropathy complication only or several ICD-9 codes to represent various conditions of the patient?
Answer: Normally, the primary diagnosis code that you list on your claim should represent the main reason for the encounter, or the condition with the highest risk of morbidity/mortality that the physician tends to during the visit. However, when you deal with a condition like diabetes, the situation changes.
Section 1.A.6 of the ICD-9-CM official
Guidelines for coding and reporting certain conditions have both an underlying etiology and multiple body system manifestations owing to the underlying etiology. For conditions such as this, the ICD-9-CM(http://www.supercoder.com/icd9-codes/) has a coding convention that requires that the underlying condition be sequenced first after the manifestation.
If a patient has more than one manifestation of diabetes, more than one code from category 250 may be used with as many manifestation codes as are needed to describe the patient's diabetic condition fully.
As such, you should first use 250.6x (Diabetes with neurological manifestations). Remember to add a fifth digit to reflect the patient's type of diabetes and status of control. Your secondary code should represent the specific pain manifestation being treated. In this case, you should report 357.2 (Polyneuropathy in diabetes) as the secondary diagnosis. As because your pain practitioner documented joint inflammation, you should also report the right code describing that condition (716.91, Arthropathy, unspecified; shoulder region).
Why so many codes: Even though many payers will link only the first, main diagnosis code that you list to support the provided service's medical necessity, reporting all the diagnoses that follow the HIPAA-mandated guidelines is compliant coding. As of July 2007, Medicare must accept up to eight diagnoses for each electronic claim reported. The additional diagnoses might indicate more complex presenting problems and can provide the help you might need for a higher-level E/M service.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Review Billed Service Levels with These Tips
You cannot get inside your ENT's head to know whether his MDM requires the E/M service code that he reported – however Medicare auditors are training eyes on this area while examining E/M claims, so you need to stay alert.
Auditors are not scrutinizing the exam or history as much as they weigh toward medical decision-making. However you can be your otolaryngologist's front line of defense and ensure his notes withstand scrutiny if you follow these tips:
Tip 1: Take this strategy's help to identify a mismatch
When your staff gets together for an education meet next time, remind your ENTs that medical necessity should be the overarching factor they use to choose the E/M service level. Just because a physician does a comprehensive history and examination does not mean he should report 99215. Medical necessity should drive the components that he carries out. This is of particular importance with the implementation of EHR systems, which automatically code encounters without regard to medical necessity. It's very easy to document high levels of history and exams, particularly for established patients, which'll result in level four services when the medical necessity may dictate only level two or three services.
You can help ensure your doctors are choosing the proper codes by occasionally pulling a sample of their charts. Take a look at the patient's chief complaint and the encounter's outcome or its final diagnosis. If the main ICD-9 code doesn't support a billed upper level of service, you should really read the chart notes.
Tip 2: Look for potential MBM-boosting factors
However, complimenting factors could make 99214 and 461.x a match. The patient may have comorbidities or other chronic conditions. And medications that the patient is already taking or or adverse reactions the patient had to previous medications could up the level of MDM. Comorbidities, frequency of episodes of sinusitis, the plan of care, and the like may complicate the medical decision making also.
To add to it, evaluation of symptoms possibly related to sinusitis like fatigue, headache, fever and cough can boost the MDM. When you work up a sinusitis, if a patient has these other symptoms also, then you ensure he does not have any problems that could be more serious.
Source URL :- http://www.supercoder.com/coding-newsletters/my-otolaryngology-coding-alert/em-services-5-tips-help-you-review-billed-service-levels-article
Tip 3: Uncover extra complexity in these places
Medication can lead to a higher-level MDM another way. Take a look at the tests and medications the otolaryngologist ordered for clues to the extra complexity the doctor may not be explaining. Here are a couple of tips to make identifying increased complexity easier:
See the history of present illness and review of systems to determine what the ENT is trying to rule out.
Encourage your ENTs to state what diagnoses they hope to rule out or confirm.
Be wary: Do not put such ‘rule out' diagnoses on your claims. Doing so would not be right coding.
Tip 4: Give due credit for clear management options
Intimate your doctors that they should indicate clearly when they are taking an immediate step that they do not believe will solve the patient's problem. For instance, they may try antibiotics before a more aggressive treatment, however that the patient may need a more aggressive approach can boost the level of MDM. Documenting the extra step shows that the physician considered more management options (one element of MDM).
Tip 5: Look at patient's complexity
Sometimes a low level of MDM can support a 99214. You cannot just look at the MDM; you also have to look at the complexity of the patient.
Auditors are not scrutinizing the exam or history as much as they weigh toward medical decision-making. However you can be your otolaryngologist's front line of defense and ensure his notes withstand scrutiny if you follow these tips:
Tip 1: Take this strategy's help to identify a mismatch
When your staff gets together for an education meet next time, remind your ENTs that medical necessity should be the overarching factor they use to choose the E/M service level. Just because a physician does a comprehensive history and examination does not mean he should report 99215. Medical necessity should drive the components that he carries out. This is of particular importance with the implementation of EHR systems, which automatically code encounters without regard to medical necessity. It's very easy to document high levels of history and exams, particularly for established patients, which'll result in level four services when the medical necessity may dictate only level two or three services.
You can help ensure your doctors are choosing the proper codes by occasionally pulling a sample of their charts. Take a look at the patient's chief complaint and the encounter's outcome or its final diagnosis. If the main ICD-9 code doesn't support a billed upper level of service, you should really read the chart notes.
Tip 2: Look for potential MBM-boosting factors
However, complimenting factors could make 99214 and 461.x a match. The patient may have comorbidities or other chronic conditions. And medications that the patient is already taking or or adverse reactions the patient had to previous medications could up the level of MDM. Comorbidities, frequency of episodes of sinusitis, the plan of care, and the like may complicate the medical decision making also.
To add to it, evaluation of symptoms possibly related to sinusitis like fatigue, headache, fever and cough can boost the MDM. When you work up a sinusitis, if a patient has these other symptoms also, then you ensure he does not have any problems that could be more serious.
Source URL :- http://www.supercoder.com/coding-newsletters/my-otolaryngology-coding-alert/em-services-5-tips-help-you-review-billed-service-levels-article
Tip 3: Uncover extra complexity in these places
Medication can lead to a higher-level MDM another way. Take a look at the tests and medications the otolaryngologist ordered for clues to the extra complexity the doctor may not be explaining. Here are a couple of tips to make identifying increased complexity easier:
Be wary: Do not put such ‘rule out' diagnoses on your claims. Doing so would not be right coding.
Tip 4: Give due credit for clear management options
Intimate your doctors that they should indicate clearly when they are taking an immediate step that they do not believe will solve the patient's problem. For instance, they may try antibiotics before a more aggressive treatment, however that the patient may need a more aggressive approach can boost the level of MDM. Documenting the extra step shows that the physician considered more management options (one element of MDM).
Tip 5: Look at patient's complexity
Sometimes a low level of MDM can support a 99214. You cannot just look at the MDM; you also have to look at the complexity of the patient.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)